Filed: September 22, 2022
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Overview: Amicus brief explaining the importance of individuals having the ability to sue state and local governments when their civil rights are violated under Medicaid and other public programs.
Excerpt: The linkage between the RA’s and the ADA’s antidiscrimination mandate and Medicaid provisions implementing that mandate is evidence that Congress intended both aspects of its disability-rights scheme to be privately enforceable. That conclusion is bolstered by the fact that Congress, when enacting the ACA, broadened Medicaid’s “entitlement” provisions by expanding the definition of “medical assistance.” Congress did so in direct response to judicial decisions narrowly construing that term in § 1983 suits brought by people with disabilities. Petitioners’ request that this Court abandon its longstanding holding that Spending Clause legislation can give rise to a private right of action under § 1983 would undermine Congress’s scheme for enforcing disability rights. People with disabilities, including children, regularly bring private lawsuits to enforce each of their independent, mutually reinforcing entitlements under the RA, the ADA, and Medicaid. Those lawsuits have vindicated important rights, providing access to life-saving therapies and everyday living support services close to one’s family and community. Absent a private right of action to enforce their Medicaid guarantees, enforcement of Medicaid would be left to the federal government, which may have few enforcement options other than reduction of States’ Medicaid funding. That may exacerbate rather than remedy States’ failure to comply with Medicaid’s requirements.
Case Documents
Amicus Brief
Supreme Court Opinion
Press Releases
Amicus Brief Filed in U.S. Supreme Court Case Emphasizes Harms to People with Disabilities
A Major Win for Disability Rights From SCOTUS
Related Media
Indy Star: Op/Ed: Treatment of patient at Indiana nursing home at center of U.S. Supreme Court case
Indy Star: Marion County agency wants SCOTUS to strip protections for millions of vulnerable Americans
Indy Star: Supreme Court denies Health & Hospital Corp.’s effort to block civil rights lawsuits
Yahoo News: Here’s why Nancy Pelosi, Todd Rokita, Biden administration care about Indiana nursing home
Disability Scoop: Supreme Court Case Could Sharply Limit Disability Rights
Disability Scoop: Supreme Court To Hear Case That Could Have Major Consequences For People With Disabilities
Vox: The nightmarish Supreme Court case that could gut Medicaid, explained
Vox: Medicaid appears likely to survive its latest encounter with the Supreme Court
MarketWatch: Supreme Court weighs 83 million Medicaid enrollees’ access to the courts
BU Today: The Most Consequential Supreme Court Case You Haven’t Heard Of
The 19th: Supreme Court case altering Medicaid is ‘an assault’ on older adults and people with disabilities, advocates warn
The 19th: Disability and aging advocates celebrate Supreme Court’s Talevski decision
Mother Jones: SCOTUS Just Upheld the Civil Rights of Millions of Disabled and Aging People
Wyfi: Supreme Court reinforces that Medicaid beneficiaries can sue states if their rights are violated
Axios: How nursing homes could face more patient lawsuits
