HELP Committee Report Finds OCR Reached a 12-Year Low in Enforceable Relief for Students Facing Discrimination
Staff for the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) released a new report yesterday documenting a steep decline in enforceable civil rights outcomes at the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR), including in cases involving students with disabilities.
The report finds that OCR reached 112 resolution agreements in 2025, down from 507 in 2024, a steep drop in one of the main ways OCR can require schools to fix civil rights violations. That’s about 1% of the 11,985 civil rights cases the report says were pending. For disability discrimination cases, the report lists 5,794 pending cases and only 83 resolution agreements in 2025, down from 390 in 2024.
That drop comes after major disruption to OCR’s capacity. In March 2025, nearly half of OCR staff were affected by a reduction in force, a change that reduced the number of investigators available to respond to students and schools and contributed to instability in how complaints were handled.
Bottom line: resolution agreements are one of the main ways OCR can require a school to fix a civil rights violation. Without a resolution agreement, families often don’t get a schoolwide fix, and the same barriers can continue for the family who filed and the students who come after them.
Key takeaways from the report on disability cases
The report shows that some of the most serious disability-related categories had little to no enforceable relief in 2025, including:
- Restraint and/or seclusion: 172 pending cases, 0 resolution agreements
- Disability harassment: 595 pending cases, 1 resolution agreement
- FAPE (free appropriate public education): 1,887 pending cases, 40 resolution agreements
The report also describes civil rights enforcement at a 12-year low and notes that multiple regional civil rights offices have been closed, shrinking the federal capacity families and schools rely on.
Why OCR capacity is the difference between rights and reality
“This report shows federal civil rights enforcement in education, an essential tool provided by Congress to help fight disability discrimination, is being denied to students with disabilities,” said Katy Neas, CEO of The Arc of the United States. “OCR is where families turn when a student is denied accommodations or accessibility, pushed out of learning time, or harassed or disciplined unfairly because of disability. When OCR isn’t delivering solutions schools must follow, students lose learning time, families lose a workable path to resolve what’s happening, and schools are left with uncertainty and weaker oversight. Students with disabilities pay the price now, and it shapes what comes next, from graduation to employment and independence.”
What this means for families of students with disabilities
Families often turn to OCR after they have documented the problem and tried to resolve it through the school and district with no meaningful change. When OCR enforcement is inconsistent, urgent issues can drag on while a student keeps losing access to learning and support.
Families turn to OCR for urgent situations like:
- A student being denied accommodations or accessibility
- Repeated removals from class instead of support
- Disability-based harassment not being addressed
- Discriminatory discipline that keeps a child out of learning time
- Restraint and seclusion issues that demand immediate accountability
OCR is one of the few avenues families can pursue without having to hire a lawyer or spend years in court.
What this means for schools and educators
Schools rely on OCR enforcement and guidance. When enforcement is inconsistent or guidance isn’t available, confusion grows and problems linger.
- Schools lose clear, reliable direction about what compliance looks like.
- Disputes last longer and are more likely to escalate into conflict, due process, or litigation.
- Inconsistent enforcement leads to uneven practices across districts.
Why The Arc is weighing in
The Arc exists because families had to fight for the basic right of children with disabilities to be educated. Our advocacy helped lay the groundwork for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and for decades we’ve worked to protect and strengthen it so students can learn alongside nondisabled students with the support they need.
Today, our policy team regularly meets with members of Congress and education officials to protect IDEA and Section 504, and to push for the staffing and oversight that make those rights real in schools.
The Arc is also a plaintiff in Somerville Public Schools et al. v. Trump et al., a federal lawsuit challenging efforts to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education, because weakening federal capacity threatens special education oversight and civil rights enforcement that students with disabilities rely on.
Next steps to restore civil rights enforcement in education
The report points to a simple reality: students’ rights depend on a civil rights office that can do its job consistently and transparently. OCR’s work affects students facing discrimination based on disability, race, national origin, and sex, and families need a process that leads to real answers and real fixes.
If OCR is going to protect students and provide meaningful accountability, these steps can’t wait:
- Fully staff and stabilize OCR so complaints get a real review and timely decisions.
- Restore transparency by regularly publishing basic information about workload, timelines, and outcomes so families and schools can understand what’s happening.
- Act quickly when a student is facing ongoing harm or being shut out of education, including cases involving denial of accommodations or accessibility, harassment, discriminatory discipline, and restraint or seclusion.
- Communicate clearly with families and schools about what to expect after a complaint is filed, including timelines, reasons cases are dismissed, and what steps schools must take when OCR finds a violation.
For reporters: Interview availability
Robyn Linscott, Director of Education and Family Policy at The Arc of the United States, is available for interviews on what the report’s findings mean for students with disabilities and what policymakers are weighing based on input from families and school systems.
Frequently Asked Questions about OCR enforcement and students with disabilities
What is a resolution agreement at the Office for Civil Rights?
A resolution agreement is a formal agreement that requires a school to take specific steps to fix a civil rights problem identified through OCR’s process.
Why do OCR resolution agreements matter for students with disabilities?
They can require changes like providing accommodations, fixing accessibility barriers, changing discipline practices, and addressing harassment so the same harm does not continue.
What types of disability issues do OCR handle in schools?
Common issues include Section 504 accommodations, accessibility barriers, disability harassment, discriminatory discipline, and concerns related to restraint and seclusion.
What should families do if they believe a student’s disability rights are being violated?
Families can document concerns, use school and district complaint processes, and consider filing an OCR complaint when discrimination is alleged.



















