A picture of a mom and her son with IDD

Medicaid Expansion Saved Their Lives. Now Congress Wants to Cut It.

For millions of people with disabilities and their families, Medicaid isn’t optional. It’s the glue holding everything together. It’s the health care and therapies that help children grow. The prescriptions that manage chronic conditions. The daily support that helps adults with disabilities get out of bed, work, and participate in their communities. The safety net that allows caregivers to keep going day after day.

But now, Medicaid expansion, a part of the Medicaid program that offers insurance coverage for certain people, including people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, is under threat. A federal budget bill moving through Congress proposes nearly $800 billion in Medicaid cuts, with Medicaid expansion directly in the crosshairs.

What Is Medicaid Expansion and Why Does It Matter?

Medicaid expansion, introduced under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), gave states the option to extend coverage to more low-income adults, including people with disabilities, chronic health conditions, and caregivers who had long fallen through the cracks. Many of these people have very low incomes but make just enough to be outside of the Medicaid income requirements. Others have developmental disabilities that do not meet Medicaid’s disability-specific requirements. In the 41 states (including Washington, DC) that adopted it, Medicaid expansion opened the door to health care for millions who had nowhere else to turn.

Who Benefits From Medicaid Expansion?

Some lawmakers claim Medicaid cuts won’t hurt people with disabilities. But these real people share how Medicaid expansion has impacted their lives.

Eri From Massachusetts
A mom and daughter with disabilities“My mother, an early childhood educator who worked with kids with developmental disabilities, died in 2012 because she couldn’t afford her asthma inhalers. By 2014, I was a teenager experiencing homelessness after losing my only caregiver. I had asthma, a severe mood disorder, and undiagnosed autism and ADHD, but I couldn’t afford health care or medication. Once Medicaid expansion happened, everything changed. I was finally able to receive care, go to college, and rebuild my life. Today, I’m employed, commercially insured, and still receive some Medicaid as a working adult with disabilities. I lost my mom before she could be helped, but expansion gave me a second chance. I’m living proof that it works.”

Monika From California
“I’ve never had a job that offered health insurance. And I never earned enough to pay for the high cost of insurance coverage or deductibles. Then Medicaid expansion came, and I finally got answers: my fatigue and severe joint pain were untreated lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. Now I get the care I need, and can keep caring for my dad, who has advanced Alzheimer’s and a brain tumor. My life and my family’s literally depend on Medicaid.”

What Happens If Congress Cuts Medicaid Expansion?

If Congress moves forward with these cuts, millions will lose access to care. Medicaid expansion has helped people:

  • Get diagnosed and treated
  • Access therapies that support their development
  • Learn, work, and contribute to their communities
  • Live safely at home instead of being institutionalized

Without it, we’ll see more uninsured people and more families pushed to the brink. And the people hit hardest? People with disabilities, caregivers, and low-income adults who are already navigating the most.

Is Medicaid Popular?

Yes, and public support is growing. New polling shows that 83% of Americans have a favorable view of Medicaid, up from 77% just months ago. That support only grows when people understand what’s at stake.

Medicaid Is Not a Handout. It’s a Lifeline.

When lawmakers say people with disabilities won’t be affected, they’re ignoring real people like Eri and Monika. People whose lives and futures depend on Medicaid expansion.

Their stories aren’t the exception. They’re reality.

We can’t afford to go backward—not now, not ever. Too much is on the line.

Read. Share. Take action before it’s too late. Urge Congress to protect Medicaid now.

A picture of a brown gavel against a white background

Challenging Segregation of Children with Disabilities in Foster Care

In May 2025, The Arc and other disability rights organizations filed an amicus brief in support of the Plaintiffs-Appellants in the case Jonathan R. v. Morrisey. The case is about children with disabilities challenging disability discrimination in a state foster care system, and the ability of the district court to grant them relief.

What Are the Facts About Jonathan R. v. Morrisey?

The plaintiffs are children with disabilities in West Virginia’s foster care system. The plaintiffs filed this class action lawsuit claiming that state officials discriminated against them by failing to provide foster care services in integrated settings.

By law, people with disabilities should receive services in the setting that allows them to interact with non-disabled people to the fullest extent possible. This is required by Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and reinforced by the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Ziming.

The plaintiffs alleged that West Virginia is placing children with disabilities in segregated settings, in violation of the ADA and Section 504. The plaintiffs asked that the court declare the actions of the West Virginia Department of Human Services (DHS) to be unconstitutional and that the court grant relief that will reform DHS and ensure that it follows federal disability law. Specifically, the plaintiffs seek what is called systemic injunctive relief, which aims to change the child welfare system as a whole. Systemic injunctive relief focuses on remedying larger issues with a service system, instead of narrow/individual violations of the law.

The district court dismissed the case on the grounds that it did not have the power to grant relief because doing so would put the court in the position of policy maker. The court also held that the West Virginia foster children did not have standing to pursue their claims. The plaintiffs appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Why Does This Case Matter for People with Disabilities?

Children with disabilities in the child welfare system are entitled to be served in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs, but this is often not the reality. Federal courts have the power to protect the rights of people with disabilities through systemic relief. If the appeals court upholds the district court’s decision, it will make it significantly more difficult for people with disabilities to seek systemic injunctive relief for violations of the ADA and Section 504.

What is The Arc’s Position?

In our amicus brief, The Arc its and partners explain that children with disabilities in West Virginia’s foster care system are being unlawfully segregated in residential institutions and other types of facilities, instead of receiving services in community-based settings. The plaintiffs have the right to sue under those laws to challenge that segregation in federal court. Because discrimination against people with disabilities often occurs across a system of government services, courts regularly offer systemic relief to end a systemic violation of federal disability rights.

The Arc joined this amicus brief because of our position statement on early childhood services, which states that “substantial research and successful experience have established that early childhood services should be delivered in natural settings and, to the maximum extent possible, with same-aged peers who do not have disabilities.” Additionally, The Arc’s position statement on Human and Civil Rights states that “all people with IDD have the right to accommodations, assistance, and supports they need to exercise and ensure their human and civil rights.” Human and civil rights include the right to justice, equality, well-being, and equality of opportunity.

Courts have the power to grant appropriate systemic injunctive relief when it is necessary to remedy discrimination against people with disabilities.

Where Can I Find More Reading?

Jonathan R. v. Morrisey Case Page

An up close photo of a woman with Down syndrome crying in response to the R-word

The Truth About the R-Word, From the People It Hurts Most

The R-word is everywhere again. It’s showing up on social media, in schools, in entertainment, in the media, and in everyday conversations.

People throw it out casually as a joke or a way to tear someone down. But for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), it has never been “just a word.” It’s a slur—a word used to devalue their worth and humanity.

The disability community has fought for decades to end the use of this word. While we’ve made real progress, its resurgence today is a warning: progress is fragile. Every time this word is spoken, it reinforces outdated and harmful ideas about who belongs, who matters, and who is worthy of respect.

This isn’t a minor slip in language. It’s a sign that empathy, dignity, and basic decency are being lost—and that impacts all of us. Choosing not to say the R-word is a start, but it’s not enough. We need more people to understand why the R-word is offensive, why it’s still harmful, and why it must stop.

Listen to people with IDD who have lived with the weight of this word their entire lives.

 

Why The R-Word Is Harmful: In Their Own Words

“I am one of those people who was called the R-word simply because I was different my whole life. I tried to tell people how hurtful that was, and that my name was Jill, but no one listened. It made me feel so little and useless. Like many people with IDD, I struggled with not fitting in at school and being fired from jobs after high school because of the wrong fit—all while being called the R-word. I wanted to have friends like everyone else, but instead I was made fun of and ignored. I was so lonely and unhappy in those days. But I learned that having an IDD is nothing to be ashamed of. I’m a caring, loving person trying to find her place in this big world.”
Jill Egle, Louisiana
An up close photo of Shawn, a Black man with a disability
“I have been called the R-word and that makes me feel less than human. It invalidates my experience as a person, and every time I hear that word, it makes me feel like we’re going back to the old days—when they used to use that word to justify putting us in institutions. The R-word Is a dangerous word because it demonizes those who have the disabilities and suggests that we’re not human. I’m scared that they might try to use that word again as a medical term. We cannot let them do that.”
Shawn Aleong, Pennsylvania
An up close photo of Veronica, a Hispanic woman with a disability
“If you use the R-word, it tells me you don’t care about me or people like me. If you use the R-word, it tells me you don’t really respect me or people like me. If you use the R-word, it tells me you don’t know who I really am or what I can do—but it also tells me all I need to know about you.”
Veronica Ayala, Texas
An up close photo of Nicole, a White woman with IDD
“Every time I hear the R-word, I want to run, hide, and curl up into a ball. I was bullied and called the R-word from elementary school to early adulthood. I often wished I was normal. My only friends at school were the teachers on the playground. I also grew up with a brother saying the R-word when he would get pissed off, and it took years to get him and others to understand how harmful it is. We need to stop the R-word now more than ever. It’s just as harmful even if it’s not being said to someone’s face. It’s time to demand a world where people with disabilities—visible or invisible—are respected and accepted for who they are!”
Nicole LeBlanc, Maryland

“The R-word hurts me. I was called the R-word by my school psychologist when I was in kindergarten. They told my parents I would not amount to anything—that I’d always be dependent on someone. Considering where I am today, I would say she was very, very wrong. I am not the only one who has been called this harmful word. Many of us with disabilities still face this same type of ignorance and discrimination.”
Taylor Crisp, Washington State
An up close photo of Ricky, a Black man with IDD
“Back in the day, people referred to people like me as the R-word. We are not that word. We may all communicate differently and have different needs—that is normal. We also have strengths and values. We fought for many years not just to change the use of the R-word, but also the negative thinking about people with IDD. Using this word goes backwards. The younger generation should go forward. I want to see them have an easier time than I had. It is time to finally bury the R-word.”
Ricky Broussard, Texas
An up close photo of Charlotte, a White woman with Down syndrome
“As someone born with a disability, it is heartbreaking that the R-word is still being used. People with disabilities have been trying for a very long time to have their inherent worth and value acknowledged by society, and have campaigned for the R-word to be removed from use. It is disgraceful that we still have to ask for basic respect. The R-word is derogatory and dehumanizing. I wish that people would look beyond themselves and see people with disabilities for who we are and the abilities we have, not just our disability diagnoses. We want to be treated with dignity and respect, just like everyone else.”
Charlotte Woodward, Virginia
An up close photo of Zoe, a Black woman with IDD, with her hands covering her mouth
“The R-word really hurts, even if someone says it as a joke. I’m a person, not a label. I matter, we matter, and everyone deserves to be treated with respect and kindness.”
Zoe-Rebekah Bostic, Georgia

“I was called the R-word for many years in school, especially on the bus. It meant I was dumb or stupid, and I buried my head in books to deal with it. To hear people use that word is demeaning. There’s no real excuse for it. It’s sad that in our schools, this kind of thing isn’t taught. Before you use it again, you should find out what the word means because you have offended me and hundreds of thousands of people by using it.”
Chad Widing, Connecticut
An up close photo of Barb, a White woman with IDD
“In high school, I was called the R-word all the time. It made me shrink away—it felt terrible. I can’t believe it’s coming back. I feel very hurt, especially after we fought to get rid of that word. No one should be called it, even if they “don’t mean it.” We are people, just like everyone else.”
Barbara Coppens, New Jersey
An up close photo of Ray, a White man with IDD
“Back in the 1970s, I was called every name in the book. They called me the R-word, crazy, and other hateful stuff. People told me I didn’t belong in the neighborhood or I didn’t belong at work. That is bullying! It lowered my self-esteem. People who use that word must not have any idea what it’s like to be labeled the R-word. I wish they could walk in my shoes to see how it feels. We need to stop labeling people. We are all somebody. I should be able to freely go into the community without this stigma.”
Ray Schuholz, Michigan
An up close photo of Sarvesh, a Middle Eastern man with IDD
“The R-word makes me feel sad. I feel that I should speak up and ask people to stop using the R-word. The word is ableist and derogatory. It stereotypes people, promotes institutionalization, and encourages eugenics.”
Sarvesh Chandran, Arizona


If reading this made you uncomfortable—good. That means you care.

But not saying the R-word isn’t enough.

Some of the people you’ve heard from here—like Jill, Nicole, and Ricky—have helped lead efforts in their states to remove the R-word from laws and policies. Changing laws is an important step, but changing hearts, language, and culture takes all of us.

We need you to say something when others use the R-word.
We need you to share this blog widely.
We need you to be part of the reason this word finally fades from our culture.

The R-word still hurts. But together, we can make sure it has no place in our future.

Note: Throughout this piece, we’ve chosen to refer to the slur in question as “the R-word,” and we’ve capitalized the R to recognize the serious harm the word represents. Naming it this way centers its weight and impact, without unnecessarily repeating a word that has caused so much pain.

A white man in a wheelchair on the sidewalk smiling while facing the camera

Journalist Resource: How to Cover Disability Pride Month 2025 (Reporting Guide)

What is Disability Pride Month?

Every July, Disability Pride Month offers newsrooms an opportunity to report on one of the largest—and too often overlooked—communities in the country: people with disabilities.

Disability Pride Month commemorates the signing of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) on July 26, 1990. Today, more than 1 in 4 U.S. adults identify as having a disability. But despite its size, the disability community remains underrepresented and often misrepresented in media coverage. Disability Pride Month offers a chance to tell more accurate, nuanced, and inclusive stories about disability identity, civil rights, and the barriers many still face.

Why Cover Disability Pride Month in 2025?

The 2025 Disability Pride Month theme – We Belong Here, and We’re Here to Stay – was chosen by a national group of people with disabilities. The theme reflects both the community’s resilience and growing concerns about threats to disability rights and services. While people with disabilities are part of every community, many are made to feel like outsiders.

Several policy and cultural issues are driving new urgency:

  • Medicaid: Proposed cuts and work requirements threaten essential care and independence. (learn more)
  • Special Education: Federal cuts and nationwide staffing crises are widening equity gaps in schools. (learn more)
  • Social Security: Delays, office closures, and policy rollbacks are limiting access to benefits. (learn more)
  • DEI Rollbacks: As corporate commitments to diversity decline, disability inclusion is caught in the middle—impacting jobs, visibility, and representation.
  • Language: Slurs like the R-word are re-entering public discourse, fueling stigma and exclusion. (learn more)

These national issues have deeply local consequences—offering timely, community-centered story opportunities for journalists across the country.

What Does Disability Pride Mean?

Disability Pride affirms that disability is a natural part of the human experience, not something to hide or fix.

For some, pride means celebrating identity. For others, it’s about rejecting shame and fighting for the right to exist fully and freely. Pride can be personal, complex, and sometimes quiet—but at its core, it’s about dignity and belonging.

While distinct from LGBTQ+ Pride Month in June, Disability Pride Month in July similarly emerged from civil rights struggles and a refusal to be erased.

Reporting Tips: Ethical, Inclusive Coverage of Disability Pride Month

  • Talk to people with disabilities in your community about what Disability Pride means to them, and what’s at stake. Their lived experiences bring depth and urgency to many of today’s issues. Avoid only interviewing caregivers or parents unless necessary for context. Some individuals may use communication supports—those tools should be accommodated and not viewed as barriers. Steer clear of oversimplified or patronizing narratives. Respect disabled people’s expertise and full humanity.
  • Localize national policy stories. Explore how federal threats and cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, special education, and Social Security are affecting people with disabilities and families in your coverage area. These are national crises with local consequences—and they’re newsworthy.
  • Cover Disability Pride events—but also go deeper. Disability Pride events offer entry points, but deeper stories lie in ongoing struggles for equity, representation, and access. Ask what the community wants covered and how they want to be seen.
  • Cover disability all year. Disability Pride Month is a vital moment to connect—but the need for inclusive, accurate disability coverage continues year-round.

Finding Local Stories & People

Local chapters of The Arc, disability organizations, advocacy groups, and self-advocate networks are often willing to connect reporters with people with disabilities, families, and professionals eager to share their experiences. Many have long histories of working with media and can help ensure authentic, respectful sourcing.

Helpful Resources for Journalists Covering Disability Pride Month

Explainer: What Is Disability Pride Month? (The Arc)
History of the Disability Pride Flag (Columbia University)
Disability Language Style Guide (National Center on Disability & Journalism)

Contact

Jackie Dilworth
The Arc of the United States
dilworth[at]thearc.org

Jonathan Gardner pictured with his dad and Patient Cookie

6 Powerful Father’s Day Stories From People With Disabilities

What makes a great dad or father figure?

For some, it’s a quiet kind of support that needs no spotlight. For others, it’s encouragement, guidance, a sense of safety, or someone who listens without judgment.

Sometimes that person is a biological father. Other times, it’s a stepdad, grandfather, mentor, teacher, or chosen family member. What matters isn’t the label—it’s how they show up and what they make possible. It’s not about being a perfect dad. It’s about being present, flexible, and fiercely in your corner.

This Father’s Day, we asked people with disabilities: How has your dad—or a father figure—shaped your life?

Here are six real stories about strength, support, and showing up.

Jonathan Gardner pictured with his dad and Patient Cookie

Jonathan and his dad

“When I was 18, I was diagnosed with Ewing’s sarcoma, a rare and aggressive cancer. I also have autism, so I experience sensory things like touch and routine differently. When I found out I needed a port placed in my chest for chemotherapy, I was overwhelmed and scared. But my dad knew exactly what I needed. He gave me a Cookie Monster plush, one of my favorite characters, that had a real chemotherapy port sewn into his chest—just like mine. My dad made sure it looked exactly the way I would look, with tape and bandages too. Being able to feel the port on Cookie Monster helped me understand what was going to happen to my own body. That Cookie Monster, who we named Patient Cookie, came with me to every single appointment. It was like having a piece of my dad with me, especially on the days he couldn’t be there because of work. I am now 3 years Cancer Free and use Patient Cookie to teach medical students through Operation House Call with The Arc of Massachusetts. I use him to show future doctors and nurses that caring for someone with a disability means more than just treating their illness, it means taking the time to understand the whole person. My dad is the perfect example of that. He gave me comfort, safety, and a way to face something scary. He turned my fear into understanding, and that’s just one of the many reasons why my Dad is so important to me, and why I love him so much.”
Jonathan Gardner lives in Massachusetts and has autism

Veronica Ayala pictured sitting next to her stepdad Charlie

Veronica and her stepdad

“My stepdad, Charlie, never tried to replace my father—he wanted to be my friend. I don’t call him Dad, but he’s been more of one than anyone else. He is very reserved but shows his love by being in my corner constantly and occasionally in my apartment with a wrench or a screwdriver. I often hear about how proud he is or how amazing he thinks I am from others. He doesn’t define me by the things I don’t have or can’t do because I have disability. He always just waited for me to tell him what I needed rather than assuming anything about what I couldn’t do. It feels great to know that someone as strong as he thinks that you are just as strong but in a different way. I recently lost my purse with my phone and ID in it before boarding a plane. I was able to contact my sister to let her know I might be stuck at the airport overnight. My mother went into a panic and wanted to jump in the car and bring me back home. Not Charlie. He calmly tells my mom not to worry. “She is a smart girl, she’s going to get herself on the plane and get herself home.” He was right. I talked to the right people, I explained my situation, I got through an extended TSA security check, and I made it on to my flight home. What did Charlie say? “I told you she would do it.” Thank you, Charlie, for always being there and believing in me.”
Veronica Ayala lives in Texas and has cerebral palsy

Marina Agerter sitting at a table with her dad

Marina and her dad

“My dad helped me through my traumatic brain injury [following a car accident]. I was in inpatient therapy and my dad would help me read the Harry Potter books. I lost my ability to read, but it was through practice and hard work and love that I was able to regain my reading ability. When I was discharged to outpatient therapy, he took me home and [my mom and dad] took turns driving me to therapy every day of the week.”
Marina Agerter lives in Virginia and has a traumatic brain injury and aphasia

Ray Simpson's grandma and grandpa sitting next to each other

Ray’s grandparents

“I was adopted and raised by my grandparents when I was very young. I called them mom and dad growing up. My dad, George, was and always will be my best friend. He taught me how to play piano, and we would sit on the bench together and play our favorite tunes. My dad was a priest for the episcopalian church most of his life. Although his faith was strong in his religion, he never judged anyone’s beliefs or culture. He welcomed discussions about life and the world. My dad taught me how to be responsible and independent with finances and to always be prepared. When he passed away in my early twenties, it left a hole in my heart. Each year on Father’s Day, I light a candle and tell him how much he meant to me.”
Ray Simpson lives in Minnesota and has anxiety, sensory processing disorder, chronic nerve damage, and complex regional pain syndrome

Taylor Crisp pictured with her dad

Taylor and her dad

“My dad has been my constant rock throughout my life. He continues to show unconditional love regardless of how old I get. He has been my number one coach and cheerleader—but also the one who teaches me to be tough in times of hardship. My autism and different support needs have never stopped him or prevented him from being the best father he can be. He is the dad that will help me face my fear and insert my dignity of risk because he believes in me and believes I deserve happiness and success. He has gone above and beyond for me, showing me what tough love and unconditional love is like. I also want to recognize my stepdad. From day one, he has been supportive and there for me. I am not only lucky to have one dad, but to have two dads to celebrate.”
Taylor Crisp lives in Washington state and has autism

Mark Dixon reading with his father

Mark and his dad

“My father served as an advocate by attending IEP meetings, reading books about the special education regulations, and making sure I had the right services to receive a free and appropriate education. He also served on a lot of boards to help people with disabilities. When I graduated from high school, my father made sure services were available so I could live in the community as independently as possible. Having watched my Dad advocate for me through the years gave me the desire to advocate for others.”
Mark Dixon lives in Virginia and has cerebral palsy


These Father’s Day stories from the disability community show how deep an impact dads and father figures can have.

To the fathers and father figures: thank you for listening, encouraging, adapting, and advocating. Your impact is lasting.

To the people who shared their stories with us: thank you for your honesty and vulnerability.

And to anyone for whom Father’s Day brings up mixed emotions—whether because of loss, distance, or difficult experiences: you’re not alone. We honor all the ways love and support can take shape.

Picture of the front of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, DC

Why This Supreme Court Case Matters for Students With Disabilities

Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond/St. Isadore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond

In May 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court couldn’t agree on a big case about whether a religious school in Oklahoma should get public money. Because the justices were split 4 to 4, the lower court’s decision stayed in place. That means the school won’t get state funding.

This case matters for students with disabilities. When public money goes to private or religious schools, those schools don’t always have to follow the same laws that protect students with disabilities. That can take away important rights and supports kids need to learn.

Here’s what you need to know.

What Is This Case About?

The U.S. Supreme Court was asked to weigh in on whether states can use taxpayer money to fund religious charter schools. Under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment, there are limits on government involvement with religion—including funding.

What Are the Facts of the Case?

In this case, Oklahoma approved a charter for St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, a religious school funded with public dollars. Private charter schools are outside of a traditional public school system, as a public school district contracts with a private entity to create the school. However, many charter schools are funded by public tax dollars, just like a traditional public school. Thus, these public charter schools are public schools under Oklahoma law and must follow federal civil rights laws. They also must not promote any one religion. So, the state of Oklahoma sued to cancel its contract with the school. The Oklahoma Supreme Court agreed and ruled that the religious charter school was unconstitutional. St. Isidore appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

What Did the Supreme Court Decide?

In May 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 4-4 split decision. Because Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself and the remaining justices were evenly divided, the lower court’s ruling stood. That means that the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s decision remains in effect: that the religious charter school was unconstitutional and public money cannot be used to fund this religious charter school.

The Arc’s Position

The Arc’s position statement on education states that every student deserves a quality education—and the law is clear that students with disabilities have the right to:

  • A free and appropriate public education
  • Individualized supports and services
  • Inclusion in general education classrooms
  • Equal access to academics, extracurriculars, and more

When schools receive public funding—whether traditional, charter, or when a private school enrolls a student with a disability who is publicly placed in that private school—The Arc maintains that they are required to follow federal civil rights laws like the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Traditional private and religious schools that do not receive public funds are largely not required to follow these laws. As explained in an amicus brief on behalf of the National Center for Learning Disabilities, religious charter schools receiving public funding would be required to serve students with disabilities to the same extent as other public schools but would likely be unable to meet their full range of needs The impact would be compounded by the overall inexperience of religious schools in accommodating the needs of students with disabilities. Religious schools may also seek First Amendment exemptions from these requirements.

Because traditional public schools must be open to all, requiring them to share funding with religious charter schools while still educating the majority of students with disabilities would further strain their resources and jeopardize the quality of the education they can provide.

That’s why The Arc strongly opposes the use of public money for schools that may be more likely to deny students with disabilities their rights.

How Does This Case Affect Students With Disabilities?

This decision protects students in Oklahoma—but it also sends a national message. Letting public dollars flow to religious private charter schools without ensuring full civil rights protections and adequate funding would harm students with disabilities.

Families should never have to give up their child’s legal rights just to find a school that works for them. But that’s what can happen when private charter programs don’t guarantee equal access. Money is taken from public schools—where federal protections apply—and given to schools where they often don’t or offer more limited protections. That can mean no individualized education plan, no supports, no recourse.

This case helps stop that from happening in Oklahoma. And it’s a win for the rights of students with disabilities.

Further Reading